In an Illinois personal injury case, a jury may compare the defendant's alleged negligence to any negligence committed by the injury victim and determine if the plaintiff's own conduct contributed to cause his or her own injuries. This is called "contributory negligence." At trial the judge will instruct the jury,
When I use the expression "contributory negligence," I mean negligence on the part of the plaintiff that proximately contributed to cause the [alleged] [injury] [death] [property damage].I.P.I. 11.01
If a jury finds that the injury victim was more than 50% at fault for causing his or her own injuries then the plaintiff will be completely barred from recovering money damages, just like if the defendant is found not liable. However, if the jury finds that the plaintiff's conduct was 50% or less the cause of his or her own injuries then the jury's damage award will be reduced by that amount. 735 ILCS 5/2-1116(c)
Within the context of this law, the defense in a bicycle accident case may wish to present evidence to the jury that the injured bicyclist contributed to his or her injuries by not wearing a helmet. Illinois law, however, prohibits the defense from presenting evidence that the plaintiff was not wearing a helmet at the time of the alleged incident. Attorneys representing an injured bicyclist should file a motion in limine barring the defense from presenting evidence that the plaintiff was not wearing helmet. In 1985, two cases were decided that relate to this issue. In Clarkson v. Wright, 483 N.E.2d 268 (Ill. 1985) the supreme court held that evidence that a plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident case was not wearing seat belt at the time of the alleged occurrence is not admissible. The Court stated:
We agree with the majority view that failure to use a seat belt was not negligence or contributory negligence which caused the accident out of which plaintiff's injuries arose. At most, the failure to use a seat belt created a condition which possibly may have increased the severity of plaintiff's injuries. . . We conclude that . . . evidence of failure to wear a seat belt should not be admitted with respect to either the question of liability or damages.This rule of law was expanded to include motorcycle helmets in Hukill v. DiGregorio, 484 N.E.2d 795 (2nd Dist. 1985). In that matter, the appellate court, citing the Clarkson decision which came down just a few months earlier, held that the "helmet defense" should be barred from mitigating the plaintiff's damages. These two decisions created the general principal that in vehicular negligence cases evidence of the plaintiff's failure to use protective devices "is inadmissible for the purpose of establishing contributory negligence." Moore v. Swoboda, 571 N.E.2d 1056, 1071 (4th Dist. 1991).
Clarkson, 483 N.E.2d at 269-70. (This rule was later codified in Section 12-603.1 of the Illinois Vehicle Code.)
The Clarkson, Hukill and Swoboda cases -- along with the fact that Illinois law does not mandate helmet use -- establish that a bicyclist's failure to wear a helmet may not be used as either a damages reducer or to bar recovery altogether. Remember, though, as I noted at the beginning of this post, jurors may be wondering whether a helmet was worn. They may be off put by silence on the matter during trial and hold it against the plaintiff, who owns the burden of proof at trial. If the injured bicyclist was wearing a helmet then the trial lawyer should note that fact.
微風成人 ut視訊交友 彩虹聊天 a免費線上 手機視訊交友 女優露點影片 性感車展美女 av影片下載 走光+偷拍+自拍 彩虹視訊聊天室 85cc 情趣 18h 可愛視訊少女 85ccst影城 歐美a片論壇 007情色小說 自拍色情圖 彰化一夜情聊天室 s383影城 完美女人工廠 影音視訊聊天 做愛美女 視訊辣妹網 人妻自拍 歐美熟女做愛成人 視訊成人網 空姐性愛影片 aa圖免費看 美女寫真貼圖 85cc免費成人 成人短片 情色貼圖 視訊聊天 杜蕾斯貼圖區正妹牆 正妹援交 嘟嘟情人色網貼圖 鋼管秀 avvcd 洪爺影片城 國中大奶f sex888免費影片 色遊戲下載區 巨乳人妻影片 性貼圖 後宮 限制級遊戲 0204成人電影 免費性愛貼片 走光照
ReplyDelete