Bicyclist In Rolling Meadows Dragged 20 Feet Under Car Of Elderly Driver

Cyclist's bike lodged under car that hit her.
Courtesy of The Daily Herald

A 78 year old driver struck a female bicyclist yesterday in Rolling Meadows, dragging her some 20 feet underneath his vehicle, according to The Daily Herald.  After she was extracted from under the car, the cyclist was taken to Northwest Community Hospital in stable condition.  The nature of her injuries is not clear from news reports.

The incident occurred at around 9:20 a..m. at a commercial driveway exit located at 2905 Algonquin Road, according to the Herald.  The 34 year old woman was riding legally on the sidewalk when the elderly man exited the parking lot of a cafe and struck  her.  The woman and her bicycle were lodged under the vehicle for a period.  The driver was ticketed for failing to yield to the bicyclist.

In Rolling Meadows, as in much of Illinois, it is legal for adults to ride their bicycles on the sidewalk.  The municipality has adopted the relevant part of the Illinois Vehicle Code:

A person propelling a bicycle upon and along a sidewalk or across a roadway upon and along a crosswalk shall have all the rights and duties applicable to a pedestrian under the same circumstances.

Sec. 106-625-5/11-1512

(Sidewalk riding is not permitted for adults in the City of Chicago.)

It is not clear from reports why the driver continued on after striking the woman or why he failed to see her in the first place.

Sidewalk Riding. . . It's Complicated

Courtesy Blogging LA

Riding on sidewalks in Chicago is a "thing".  It is an illegal thing if you are 12 or older.  But it is a thing that most avid adult city cyclists will do on occasion, if just to access a bike rack or quickly escape a dangerous situation. It is perhaps a class thing too.  And this, mind you, is an uncomfortable thing to talk about.  Riders of bicycles that seem to spend much of their pedaling time on the sidewalk are the window washers, new residents on department store bikes, poor people with plastic shopping bags hanging from their handlebars.  It is also an age thing.  Sidewalks offer comfort and relative safety to the very young and very old bicyclist.

Riding on the sidewalk in the city is a. . . complicated thing.  It is something I have often dismissed as something that is plain reckless and illegal.  It posses a danger to pedestrians, particularly children, the elderly, the disabled and just should not be done, excepting those brief few feet between the street and the nearest bike rack.  Perhaps two months ago I was riding north on the new Elston Avenue buffered bicycle lane between Milwaukee Avenue and North Avenue.  It was one of the first times I had taken advantage of this new bit of bike specific infrastructure and it felt awesome.  Ahh, I could get used to this, I remember thinking as cars traveled past me far, far to my left.  Then I saw something unexpected yards in front of me, to my right, approaching the Morton Salt building:  A guy -- perhaps in his twenties or thirties -- riding his bicycle on the sidewalk right next to the gorgeous new bicycle lane.  I was really surprised.  So many have fought and begged to get this new infrastructure built.  The City has spent so much money trying to accommodate bicyclists.  How could his guy spit in the face of all of that, and break the law, by riding on the damn sidewalk?

I do not know why that particular man was riding on the sidewalk that day.  But what I have come to understand is that sidewalk riding in general is, like I said, complicated.  It is complicated for bicyclists, pedestrians and urban planners and engineers.  A recent essay by British sociologist David Horton on his Thinking About Cycling blog, does an excellent job of thoughtfully considering these complexities. He does not just speculate about why people ride on sidewalks, like I have done.  He talks to folks in an effort to understand.  Suddenly, to me anyway, sidewalk cycling does not always seem so ill considered.  A sidewalk cyclist is just a guy/gal trying to make his or her way.  It is an article I strongly recommend to all those interested in riding in the city.

Chicago Bicyclists Are Not Barred From Using City Crosswalks

Katherine Hitt

Defense attorneys, insurance adjusters and even some well meaning bicycle advocates have suggested to me that  riding a bicycle in Chicago in a crosswalk is illegal.  It is not.  Neither local ordinance nor state statute prohibit riding a bicycle in a crosswalk.  The matter is not addressed at all in Chicago's municipal code.   In the Illinois Compiled Statutes, however, it is expressly permitted, with some caveats.  The state statute states:

(a)  A person propelling a bicycle upon and along a sidewalk, or across a roadway upon and along a crosswalk, shall yield the right of way to any pedestrian and shall give audible signal before overtaking and passing such pedestrian. (b)  A person shall not ride a bicycle upon and along a sidewalk, or across a roadway upon and along a crosswalk, where such use of bicycles is prohibited by official traffic-control devices. (c)  A person propelling a bicycle upon and along a sidewalk, or across a roadway upon and along a crosswalk, shall have all the rights and duties applicable to a pedestrian under the same circumstances.

625 ILCS 5/11-1512.

A bicycle may be ridden in a crosswalk, but pedestrians have the right of way, unless authorities have explicitly chosen to bar bikes.  In Chicago, local ordinance bars adults from riding on city sidewalks, but not crosswalks.

It is not clear to me why some folks believe it is always illegal to ride in a crosswalk.  Perhaps this misunderstanding comes from Chicago's sidewalk prohibition.  Many of us tend to think of a crosswalk as a natural extension of a sidewalk.  There is some logic in this thinking, but the law defines crosswalks and sidewalks differently.  Chicago ordinance defines a crosswalk as

[T]hat portion of a roadway ordinarily included within the prolongation or connection of sidewalk lines at intersections, or any other portion of a roadway clearly indicated for pedestrian crossing by markings.

Municipal Code of Chicago 9-4-010 (emphasis added).

State statute defines a crosswalk as

(a)  That part of a roadway at an intersection included within the connections of the lateral lines of the sidewalks on opposite sides of the highway measured from the curbs, or in the absence of curbs, from the edges of the traversable roadway, and in the absence of a sidewalk on one side of the highway, that part of the highway included within the extension of the lateral lines of the existing sidewalk to the side of the highway without the sidewalk, with such extension forming a right angle to the centerline of the highway;

(b)  Any portion of a roadway at an intersection or elsewhere distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the surface placed in accordance with the provisions in the Manual adopted by the Department of Transportation as authorized in Section 11-301. 

625 ILCS 5/1-113.

A sidewalk, pursuant to both local ordinance and state statute, is

[T]hat portion of a public way between the curb, or the lateral lines of the roadway, and the adjacent property lines, intended for the use of pedestrians.

Municipal Code of Chicago 9-4-010; 625 ILCS 5/1-188.

A crosswalk is a part of the roadway.  A sidewalk is not.  If lawmakers had meant for crosswalks to be considered a part of sidewalks presumably they would have said so.  They have not.  Also, though crosswalks are intended primarily for pedestrians, I am not aware of any statute, ordinance or case that states that pedestrians are the only permitted users of crosswalks.  (As we saw in Boub v. Township of Wayne one may be a permitted though not an intended user of a roadway.)  There simply is no legal reason that supports the notion that just because it may be illegal to ride on a sidewalk that it is also illegal to ride in a crosswalk, especially in light of the language in Sec. 11-1512 which permits bikes in crosswalks so long as pedestrians are given the right of way.

Even if crosswalks exist primarily for pedestrians rather than bicyclists, there are often legitimate reasons for a cyclist to ride in a crosswalk.  An urban bicyclist will often do so when preparing to make a left turn at an intersection.  Sec. 11-1510 of the Illinois Motor Vehicle Code describes one way in which a bicyclist may legally make a left:

A person riding a bicycle . . . intending to turn left shall approach the turn as close as practicable to the right curb or edge of the roadway.  After proceeding across the intersecting roadway to the far corner of the curb or intersection of the roadway edges, the bicyclist . . . shall stop, as much as practicable out of the way of traffic.  After stopping the person shall yield to any traffic proceeding in either direction along the roadway such person had been using.  After yielding, the bicycle . . . shall comply with any official traffic control device or police officer regulating traffic on the highway along which he intends to proceed.

In other words, simply cross the road onto which you wish to travel and wait with cross traffic.  When doing so the bicyclist may find, depending on the specific roadway design and traffic circumstances, that the safest and perhaps only place in which to accomplish this maneuver is in a crosswalk.  In Chicago, and in parts of Illinois, this is perfectly legal.

I am not advocating that bicyclists unnecessarily occupy crosswalks that are clogged with pedestrians.  Doing so will often place pedestrians at unnecessary risk for injury.  On the other hand, where few or no pedestrians are present and the circumstances require it, a bicyclist should not hesitate to use the crosswalk to his or her advantage.

CDOT Video Highlights The Dangers of Sidewalk Riding

In Chicago, adults are not permitted to ride their bicycles on the sidewalk.  A new video from the Chicago Department of Transportation highlights this law and demonstrates why sidewalk riding is dangerous and, frankly, a drag.  Check it out: